I am a huge believer in free speech and I want this blog to be lively, but there are some things I want to stop it becoming - hence I quite brutally edited two posters a couple of blogs ago and both people posting deserve a fuller explanation.
I want this to be interesting, I don't want it to be somewhere where PR people in the petfood industry upload generic press releases about their food.
This needs to be like a conversation.
What Jonathan at Darlings said was very interesting but it didn't specifically address the points we were trying to debate.
Once we let one pet food manufacturer talk at great length off topic I will be defenceless to stop another company that wants to post a press release as we'll have precedent.
Claire M's post was a different kettle of fish! I love the fact that Claire was showing us a website that is obviously very interesting and I've let that stay. What I have removed is specific negative comments taken from that website about specific brands. The website in question is American and I guess they have their own libel laws, over here things are slightly different. Not stopping anyone from looking at that website, just saying they are obviously in the business of making claims about huge companies and they have their insurances in place, but I don't want to be repeating them here without seeing the evidence - plus then we'd need to give the manufacturer's the right to reply - and then doing this blog becomes a full time job and I don't have time to publish a magazine! And we'd move away from the title of the blog and become "What shouldn't I feed my dog!"
I want us to have frank and open discussions about petfood but we need to steer clear of libel to preserve our ability to debate.
Claire M asks why we were fearless in talking about bad breeding in pedigree dogs - why not name names in petfood?
The answer is simple, we have never named specific breeders and accused them of being bad - unless they've already been prosecuted. We have stimulated debate generally on that important topic with a view to there being a general improvement in standards and better education on the subject generally.
That is our wish for this subject, too!
Now back to the debate - lets take one subject at a time!
- Why should we be trying to replicate the prey diet? Why feed dogs as if they are wild animals now they don't do nearly so much exercise? Hasn't the dog evolved over its substantial time with man to share and possibly favour our food?